"jeffbert" wrote:I doubt they will ever make another Astroboy movie w/o collaboration, $, and, unfortunately, ideas from the USA. The very fact that such was the case with this film, suggests as much. If they could have done it alone, and then, exported it, why would they have done otherwise?
Sadly, I have to agree.
I read that Imagi was expecting a huge success with the film. They were discussing the idea of a sequel before the movie even premiered. After the dismal box office numbers and, now, the ties with the US cut, I'm pretty certain that the idea of a sequel is unrealistic.
I don't know if you've seen the numbers lately but it's a sad sight considering how much work was put into this movie. Not just THIS creation that came out of it, but all of the other ideas that were pondered years before. It's was in limbo for a long time.
You know the first director, Colin Brady, was replaced mid production by Bowers when Summit took over. Brady wanted to stay close to Tezuka's original story and then go for a pretty dark storyline with a lot of violence to scrape the "hard PG" line. I wonder what the story would have been like with Brady. Do you think the movie would have been a success if they would have gone with his idea to try and make this film a violent, manly version of the iconic robot and Tezuka's original story? Haha! Sure, original fans would be a little more satisfied if it had followed closer (even with the darker undertones), but do you think, Considering this is a family movie, it would have appealed to families with young children? Remember business.
This is just my opinion (contains spoilers!) and don't get me wrong, I liked the movie a lot, but I personally thought that Bowers had mixed this mildly dark storyline with a little too much comic relief. Astro's story had a nice flow for the most part and his action scenes through out the city were a lot of fun to watch and were done beautifully, but the RRF kind of seemed like filler. They weren't really important enough to the story to pop up as many times as they did. (they admitted it themselves lmfao) The story lines kind of got tangled instead of flowing into each other. And I could have done without Stones constant reminder that he had an election to win. I mean he was already established as the bad guy when he had Toby thrown out and when he insisted on using that red core for political purposes.
I guess, for a stronger story line, I think they could have spent a little more of their screen time establishing the relationship between Toby/Astro and Tenma instead of focusing on these characters that didn't really matter as much. I was confused. Astro showed a lot of creativity that Tenma frowned upon. In fact, Tenma was more than happy to home school Toby and was pleased when Toby finished that math problem, but once his "son" expressed creativity, he was unhappy. Was that something the real Toby didn't express?
From what I've heard, the film was popular among children! But unfortunately if a parent isn't interested, they aren't going to spend money on a movie ticket to take their kids. My 6 year old loved it, but even he didn't really like the RRF too much. haha!
In animation, you could have the coolest looking animation and really impressive style, but without good story telling it's not going to grab your target audience and pull'em in. It's risky business!
TL;DR The US studio is in charge of the story, unfortunately the story didn't sell, the studio gets cut from funding.
AND ADVERTISING, TOO. Counts for a LOT in all areas of business.
Oh Summit. You and your Twilight. If it hadn't have been for the trailer my sister and I both saw when we saw Up, I wouldn't have even known that they were making an Astro Boy movie!
I believe that the anticipation of a sequel is unrealistic, but you know what? I would love to be proved wrong.