Page 2 of 2
Posted: Fri Jun 30, 2006 1:20 am
by Latu
Should I have gotten an Ipod instead?
Posted: Fri Jun 30, 2006 1:39 am
by Astro Forever
Technology advances a lot in a year.

Posted: Fri Jun 30, 2006 1:49 am
by Latu
Well, I still see mp3 players like mine at my local retail stores.
Posted: Fri Jun 30, 2006 2:21 am
by Astro Forever
Yes, but not at the same price, at least I hope.

Posted: Fri Jun 30, 2006 2:22 am
by Astro Forever
Latu wrote:Should I have gotten an Ipod instead?
Well, I personally don't want one.
Posted: Fri Jun 30, 2006 2:27 am
by Latu
Oh
Posted: Fri Jun 30, 2006 3:00 pm
by DrFrag
My MP3 player has no memory built in, I had to buy a separate SD memory card (like you use in digital cameras). Which is good, becuase I got to choose the capacity and I can upgrade it easily. Or have a separate flash card for different music.
I agree with Fafner, wma is proprietary so you're better off with MP3. Flac is probably overkill though since it's lossless, unless it has a lossy compression mode I don't know about.
If you really want to test your compression quality, see if you can download a raw recording of the THX surround sound. You know that one in the movies where the sound seems to come from around you then moves together? A poor encoding bitrate will make that sound more like bubbling water.
Posted: Fri Jun 30, 2006 5:02 pm
by fafner
DrFrag wrote:Flac is probably overkill though since it's lossless, unless it has a lossy compression mode I don't know about.
You're right, it is almost 5 times mp3 compression

hmy:
I think I mixed with
Ogg Vorbis 