Just something I thought I would add, correct me if i am wrong.
I thought that only women had there feet bound so that they were small & petite & attract a husband
From my studies, I would say that is correct. If you ever get the chance to watch "Body Styles" on TLC, do so. Having seen that, I would say that foot-binding is the most extreme form of mutilation for the sake of style. However, there were some other very extreme practices, the most widely spread one still in practice is, well, I do not think I can speak of it tastefully, so I will merely say that in its mildest form, it involves the removal of a female sexual organ. Then there is the rings around the necks, that push the collar bones downward, and weaken the neck muscles such, that the woman cannot live without the rings. :angry: All in the name of satifying men's weird tastes. :huh: This particular thing was practiced by people who wore very little clothing, and as such, they felt they had to decorate the body itself. Other things such as tatoos, and skin sculpting were also practised by the nearly nude cultures.
Dr. Frag was no doubt making a joke with his reference to foot-binding, but it is no laughing matter. Those who rule often do impose arbitrary standards upon those whom they rule